This is not the USB-C port; it’s about what you do with it

Share This Post

USB-C is a powerful, flexible connector, but the port isn’t the only factor; the Alternate Mode standards supported by devices at both ends of the cable matter just as much. For instance, USB-C headphones only work if your phone, tablet, or laptop supports USB-C audio. Likewise for Ethernet and DisplayPort monitor support over USB. Even data transfer speeds are dependent on the port’s sub-rating, such as USB 3.3 Gen 1 or Gen 2, USB 4, or Thunderbolt 4. Not to mention that you need the right cable to maximize data and power transfer between gadgets. Confusing is an understatement.

That’s great news; after all, no one wants to be fiddling with multiple wires and chargers. Furthermore, the EU regulation forecasts that switching to USB-C will cut GHG emissions by 180 ktCO2e, material consumption by 2,600 tonnes, and e-waste by 980 tonnes per year. So, what’s not to like about that? Despite the good intentions, requiring USB-C connections does not address the standard’s main flaw: one cable for everything doesn’t always work in practise.


  • That said, the EU is doing what it can to make sure charging works more seamlessly. The directive requires that USB-C gadgets “charging at voltages higher than 5 volts or currents higher than 3 amperes or powers higher than 15 watts, incorporate the USB Power Delivery charging communication protocol.” In theory, all USB-PD plugs will work with all higher-power USB-C gadgets going forward, reducing the need for multiple plugs for different gadgets and charging standards. That said, the industry has already moved quite far in this direction, but this will help reduce e-waste a bit faster. However, it won’t necessarily remove duplicate plugs entirely.

  • We’ve also seen how easily the standard can be broken. A small number of USB-C gadgets, such as the Insta360 Go 2 and the Bob & Brad Q2 massager gun of all things, only charge with a C-to-A cable rather than C-to-C. Meanwhile, other devices outright refuse to work with out-of-spec cables sold for cheap on various marketplaces. For example, OnePlus cables wouldn’t charge Pixel phones back in 2015, and some cables still don’t. Following that, Google’s 3.5mm adapter and USB-C earbuds didn’t work on OnePlus phones. You’re not alone if you’ve ever been frustrated when plugging in a cable only to find the feature you want isn’t supported or doesn’t work properly. USB-C feature support is frustratingly opaque and mandating that gadgets charge using this port certainly won’t solve this bugbear. In addition, poorly implemented cables and accessories add to eventual e-waste too.

While there will be some simplification going forward, the USB-C charging landscape will still be varied and confusing for most consumers come 2024 and beyond. The EU’s move is, on balance, a welcome one that will help reduce plug e-waste and abate a few of the charging irritants that we’ve come to live with in the eight years since the 24-pin reversible connector was first announced. But with that timeframe in mind, mandating the charging port so late in the game is perhaps too little too late, especially since the law won’t come into effect until 2024 or later for laptops and only addresses the charging issue. In that time, millions more gadgets and chargers that make USB-C a messy and annoying standard to deal with will have been sold and quite likely dumped in landfills.

Case in point, the directive doesn’t prevent manufacturers from using proprietary standards in addition to USB Power Delivery. That’s probably a good thing to avoid stifling innovation but still means that some phones and other gadgets may continue to charge much faster with some plugs than others. This is further complicated by the fact that a lot of phones are already moving over to the more flexible USB Power Delivery PPS variant for more efficient charging, not to mention the host of older USB-A, Quick Charge, and other plugs/accessories many consumers already own.

Unfortunately, the EU and other regulators are stuck playing catch-up with a standard that has mutated into something quite unwieldy. While a lot of the attention has rightly been focused on Apple’s reluctance to play ball with the wider industry, that same industry has taken the USB-C standard and often failed to implement it in a way that ensures a cohesive, simple-to-understand ecosystem. Charging is certainly USB-C’s most consumer-unfriendly and wasteful failing, but the broader e-waste problem won’t be solved until all accessories work seamlessly on any USB-C port you plug them into.


Related Posts

For three years, OnePlus has been updating its Android devices

This is a change that you will likely not...

Realme Narzo 50i Prime has a starting price of $ 100

Realme Narzo 50i Prime announced with $99.99 base price....

Do you use split screen mode on your phone? Cast your vote now

To be fair, there’s the split-screen mode on Android...

Coming to Switch “Taiko no Tatsujin: Rhythm Festival”

“Welcome to Omiko City! Get ready to drum to...

Google wants to make it easy to drag and drop Chromebook apps

How is drag-to-pin different than current Chromebook pinning methods? As...
- Advertisement -spot_img