The GMC chief “understands” that the suspension of GP laptops was “disproportionate”.

Share This Post

Mr Massey said: ‘It’s obviously a live legal case so I can’t quite go into all of the details. But I did commission a review on the back of that case because on the face of it, this looks like a decision that people might suggest is disproportionate and over the top and I completely understand that.’ He added that ‘none of us have all of the definitive facts of the case’ and that he wants to handle the review ‘fairly hastily’. However, he did not respond to the Pulse question about whether he would like to see the controversial decision overturned.

The GMC’s chief executive has stated that he “fully understands” concerns that a doctor’s suspension for “dishonesty” over a laptop was “disproportionate and over-the-top.” Charlie Massey stated today at the NHS Confed Expo conference in Liverpool that he expects regulatory reform would prompt regulators to consider what are’reasonable’ results. He made the remarks in response to a query from Pulse about why the GMC opted to revisit the case and what he hopes the outcome will be.


  • Mr Massey reiterated that regulatory reform will make GMC processes ‘much less legally adversarial’ in future, and added that his ‘hope would be that that would allow [the GMC] to resolve things more quickly’. He said: ‘Regulatory reform will allow us to resolve more cases without going through that [adversarial process], which I think will be quite interesting because it will cause regulators to think about what is a reasonable outcome when we look at the totality of the issues that are in front of us.’

  • Mr Massey added: ‘The review, I hope, will tell us about things we can learn. As regulators, we always need to show some humility and not be complacent about where there’s learning. ‘And that would involve things like what happened when the referral was made? How did we engage with the referrer about all of the allegations that were made about the doctor? How do we decide what cases to take to the tribunal? How did that process work?’ The review will give the GMC ‘some lessons in the short term, which I hope we can apply very quickly’, he told delegates.

However, doctors groups had reacted angrily to the judgement, saying that a suspension was disproportionate for a relatively minor offence, with the BMA demanding an overhaul of GMC processes after the ‘incomprehensible’ ruling. Does anybody believe the sincerity of his statement? Thy are words intended to placate and appease the rising tide of anger against adversarial regulators but no doubt they will continue using their punitive methods, until the profession decide to speak up with one voice and say “no more.” I must agree. As the head of the GMC to bar a doctor from working and then to say its disproportionate is an horrendous thing to do. Surely the doctor should be instantly reinstated, compensated, receive an apology and then he should resign.

Last month, it was revealed that the GP suspended for ‘dishonesty’ over a laptop she said she had been ‘promised’ will appeal the GMC’s decision, alongside the GMC’s own review. The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) had suspended Dr Manjula Arora for a month for ‘dishonesty’ after she told an IT department she had been ‘promised’ a laptop. The tribunal said that she had ‘exaggerated’ these claims, and as a result found that her fitness to practise was impaired.


Related Posts

Windows 11: Why Amazon preceded Google as a support provider for Android apps

Despite this, the answer to why Microsoft chose Amazon...

The date of the announcement of Xiaomi 12 Ultra was released online

On the other hand, Xiaomi and Leica announced their...

Chris Evans surprises everyone online by updating to a iPhone 6

From the looks of things, it seems Evans chose...

Photo of the Asus ROG Phone 6 published on TENAA displays the entire camera

This might mean that we see multiple variants of...
- Advertisement -spot_img