The Delhi High Court asks the police for a response to Zubair’s complaint regarding the seizure of laptops

Share This Post

On July 1, while dealing with the plea, a vacation bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula directed the police to file a counter-affidavit within two weeks. In the last hearing, Zubair’s counsel Vrinda Grover argued that her client was arrested in breach of the Arnesh Kumar guidelines issued by the Supreme Court and that it was an attempt to breach his journalistic freedom as the police seized his mobile phone and laptop.

Mohammed Zubair, a journalist and co-founder of Alt News, filed a petition challenging a lower court order allowing his police custody and the seizure and examination of his laptop in connection with a contentious tweet case in 2018. The Delhi High Court has requested a response from the Delhi Police on this petition. According to IANS, Zubair was requesting the return of the laptop, device, or document that the police had taken because it was unrelated to the charges in the FIR. Four weeks were given by Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav for the Police to answer to the request. The journalist was given permission by the court to respond with a rebuttal and additional documents.

Highlights

  • Last month, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, Snigdha Sarvaria allowed custody of Zubair to Delhi Police in connection with one of his tweets on the micro-blogging platform Twitter in 2018 in which he allegedly hurt the religious sentiments of a community. In a follow-up of the case, the Special Cell of Delhi Police flew Zubair to Bengaluru to recover his laptop which he used for uploading various contents on social media sites.

  • The Supreme Court had last week granted bail to Zubair in all the six FIRs registered by the Uttar Pradesh Police in different districts over his tweets and clubbed these FIRs with the Delhi FIR. The top court disposed of Zubair’s plea by granting him bail in all the UP Police cases and also gave him liberty to move the Delhi High Court seeking the quashing of the cases. The top court clarified that its directions will apply to future cases, registered on the basis of tweets that were part of the previous FIRs, the news agency reported.

“Transmission and publication of such posts have been deliberately done by Mohammed Zubair through electronic media to insult the religious feelings of a particular community with the intent to provoke breach of peace,” read the FIR.

Zubair was charged under the Indian Penal Code’s Sections 153A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence) and 295A (deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs) for one of his objectionable tweets.

As per the FIR, accused Zubair had used a screengrab of an old Hindi movie which showed an image of a hotel, with its board reading ‘Hanuman hotel’ instead of ‘Honeymoon hotel’. In his tweet, Zubair had written, “BEFORE 2014: Honeymoon Hotel. After 2014: Hanuman Hotel”.

spot_img

Related Posts

To dominate the American mid-range market, Motorola Edge (2022) is here

In terms of design, the Edge (2022) closely resembles...

Amazon’s Fire TV Stick 4K Max is nearly the same price as Prime Day

Excited for the premiere of House of the Dragon,...

The Center has banned VLC Media Player; is it a hacking ploy?

No formal justification for the restriction on VLC Media...

Spotify and Samsung are ramping up collaboration and adding new features

In a press release, Spotify revealed that premium his...