The company that makes OLED screens is on the verge of exploding

Share This Post

Meanwhile, its balance sheet is clean, recently sporting $727 million in cash and available equivalents, with no long-term debt. The company is committed to returning excess cash to shareholders, and its dividend yield was recently 1%. If you invest in Universal Display, you’re getting a relatively small company with massive growth opportunities. Oh, and the stock was recently down 50% from its 52-week high, as nervous investors backed away from seemingly risky growth stocks. In other words, Universal Display is trading at fire sale prices, when the underlying business seems very sound. What’s not to love? (The Motley Fool has recommended Universal Display.)

Organic light-emitting diode displays are appearing in a wide range of products, from midrange cellphones to high-end television sets. Universal Display, an OLED researcher and materials vendor, is a high-octane growth stock, having more than quadrupled its sales in the last five years. Revenue increased 12% year over year in the most recent quarter, with management citing “broadening our core strengths, reinforcing our global reach, and increasing our global staff” as reasons. Universal Display is also a cash powerhouse, generating $170 million in free cash flow over the previous four quarters on $570 million in top-line sales. This translates to a cash-based profit margin of 29.8%, which is higher than one of Universal Display’s most important clients, Apple, which has a margin of 27.4%.


  • One rule of thumb suggests subtracting your age from the number 110 to arrive at a good allocation for stocks. So if you’re 40, you’d park 70% of your assets in stocks. If you can tolerate more risk, it’s fair to subtract from 120, instead, for a higher stock allocation. Remember that over long periods, stocks have generally outperformed bonds. The Fool responds: Warren Buffett, CEO of the insurance giant Berkshire Hathaway, has referred to float as “other people’s money” — “money we hold but don’t own.”

  • The Fool responds: Not necessarily. Instead, you might just figure out what portion of your assets you want to invest in bonds and stick with that until you have a reason to change your asset allocation, such as if five or more years have passed since you set it up, and you’re older now. Younger folks might keep all or most of their assets in stocks if they have several decades of investing ahead of them. Those in or nearing retirement might move a larger portion of assets into bonds.

As fund managers become more successful, delivering strong returns for their shareholders, more dollars will likely come their way. They’ll collect more in fees, but they’ll also have to find additional promising investments for that money. Ideally, they will invest in the best, most lucrative securities they can find. But they can’t always put as much as they want into any one stock.

When you — and other buyers of insurance — pay your insurance company your premiums every year, the insurer collects the money, which will help cover claims from customers. The money is collected up front, but claims are paid out throughout the year. Until that money is needed, the insurance company gets to invest it in stocks, bonds and the like — and gets to keep any profits from such investments. It can seem reassuring if an actively managed mutual fund that you’re considering is massive — meaning that many investors have trusted lots of money to it. But managers of big funds face challenges.

Most funds managers want their funds to be classified as “diversified,” so they’re required by law to have at least 75% of fund assets invested in no more than 5% of any particular issuer’s securities. Even if they’re extremely bullish on, say, six different stocks and want to invest 10% of fund assets in each, they can’t. For better or worse, they can’t make huge bets on any particular stocks. Therefore, they end up investing in their best ideas, and their next best ideas, and plenty of securities that are far from the top of their list.

The Fidelity Contrafund, for example, had spread its assets across 344 different securities as of late March. In late April, it had nearly $1 billion invested in Home Depot stock, but that made up only 0.854% of fund assets. Only 18 holdings made up more than 1% of assets. How has Fidelity’s Contrafund performed? Well, on an after-tax basis, it has lagged its benchmark index over the past three, five and 10 years — so investors would have been better off with a low-fee S&P 500 index fund.

Research actively managed mutual funds well before buying. Consider not only their performance over many years, but also fees and factors such as their managers’ tenure. Related:Active mutual funds can’t measure up to indexes — again. For practical retirement guidance and model portfolios featuring recommended funds, check out our “Rule Your Retirement” service at From M.J.K., online: My dumbest investment move has been trading too frequently in certain stocks. For example, I rode Tesla until its 5-for-1 stock split in 2020, selling at around $480 per share. I then bought shares again at $550. That’s a gain of $70 per share that I missed out on. So now I’ll keep those shares no matter what. After that Tesla education, I went back to school with another stock: I bought and sold it for gains of between $20 and $30 per share a few times. Then the other day, I sold it for a $40 gain. And once again, it’s gone up even more. So I bought it back and I swear I’ll not sell it again. I hope I’ve learned my lesson this time, but I suspect I’ll need another reminder or two. The Fool responds: Maybe you can avoid making this mistake again: Next time, before you sell, ask yourself what you think the company’s long-term growth potential is. If you can see it continuing to grow over many years, consider hanging on, so you have the chance to enjoy much bigger long-term gains.

Selling before you’ve owned a stock for more than a year will also subject you to the short-term capital gains tax rate, which is the same as your ordinary income tax rate — and very likely higher than most people’s long-term capital gains tax rate of 15%. I’m the product of a 2018 merger between two optical giants, one of which was established in France in 1849, and the other launched in Italy in 1961. The latter name is dominant in the frame business, while the former is a lens-making titan. Some of my brands are Ray-Ban, Oakley, Oliver Peoples and Costa del Mar. My licensed brands include Giorgio Armani, Coach, Bulgari, Prada and Tiffany. My retail network has more than 9,000 stores worldwide, with names such as LensCrafters, Pearle Vision and Sunglass Hut. I’m vertically integrated, handling everything from design to manufacturing to distribution. Who am I?


Related Posts

Windows 11: Why Amazon preceded Google as a support provider for Android apps

Despite this, the answer to why Microsoft chose Amazon...

The date of the announcement of Xiaomi 12 Ultra was released online

On the other hand, Xiaomi and Leica announced their...

Chris Evans surprises everyone online by updating to a iPhone 6

From the looks of things, it seems Evans chose...

Photo of the Asus ROG Phone 6 published on TENAA displays the entire camera

This might mean that we see multiple variants of...
- Advertisement -spot_img