“Specifically, with respect to Activision Blizzard video games, there is nothing unique about the video games developed and published by Activision Blizzard that is a ‘must have’ for rival PC and console video game distributors that could give rise to a foreclosure concern,” reads Microsoft’s response.
The juggernaut dismisses authorities’ concerns about anti-competition. Activision Blizzard is not producing any “must have” games, according to Microsoft, who is justifying its $68 billion acquisition offer. Activision Blizzard doesn’t have any “killer apps” that may shield it from competition from its rivals, Microsoft essentially said in a response(opens in new tab) to the New Zealand Commerce Commission (thanks, RPS(opens in new tab)).
Meanwhile, the Activision Blizzard lawsuit from California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) is ongoing, despite no new developments for several months. Back in April, the lawyer leading the case against the company resigned, claiming California governor Gavin Newsom had interfered with the lawsuit. Here’s what Microsoft’s latest acquisition could mean for Activision Blizzard and Xbox Game Studios..
Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard buyout is facing scrutiny from a number of competition regulators in several countries. The United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is still reviewing details of the deal and as well as any potential labor impacts it might have, while the UK’s competition watchdog launched its own investigation last month.
After scoring a degree in English from ASU, I worked as a copy editor while freelancing for places like SFX Magazine, Screen Rant, Game Revolution, and MMORPG on the side. Now, as GamesRadar’s west coast Staff Writer, I’m responsible for managing the site’s western regional executive branch, AKA my apartment, and writing about whatever horror game I’m too afraid to finish.