Free lunches give business access to New Mexico lawmakers

Free lunches give business access to New Mexico lawmakers

The New Mexico Foundation for Open Government says that as long as they are disclosed, it’s legal for companies to buy legislators lunches and give gifts.

On Tuesday, Democratic and Republican state legislators and their policy staff enjoyed enchiladas, roast beef sandwiches, steak salads, and other entrees with soft drinks and sides “Sponsored by Comcast,” according to an agenda released by the Legislative Education Study Committee.


  • “If the industry didn’t want anything from the legislators, then why would they be providing them with lunches?” New Mexico Ethics Watch executive director Kathleen Sabo said. “It’s just human nature. If somebody gives you something, (…) you’re going to react more favorably to them.”

  • “And then the public needs to ask ‘Why are they doing that?’ ” said Melanie Majors, the foundation’s executive director.

Around two dozen districts are required to prepare plans to provide internet to students due to a state court ruling, and legislators are deciding if they will provide additional support to districts when they meet in February for a 30-day lawmaking session.

Comcast’s name also appeared before the committee on Monday in a budget comparing bids from internet vendors collected by a school district in southern New Mexico. The Comcast bid in that district was around $1.6 million.

Legislators don’t award internet or testing contracts and can’t enrich companies directly.

But they have considered legislation that would make it easier and cheaper for Comcast to expand its costly internet delivery system, which involves the laying of a physical cable, sometimes along trenches controlled by the state or public utilities.

Republican Sen. Gay Kernan, of Hobbs, said sponsored lunches have been common practice in her 19 years serving the legislature, and that a sandwich can’t buy her vote. “It doesn’t influence me one way or the other,” said Kernan, adding that she doesn’t decide which companies the education department selects for contracts.

A former state legislator who says he refused to accept as much as a bottle of water from lobbyists believes there is a problem. “The appearance of impropriety is always there when you accept something free, number one. Number two is only the legislator themselves know whether or not they’re being influenced,” said retired Republican representative Jim Dines, a former attorney who now lives in Lubbock, Texas.

Dines lost his seat to a Democrat in 2018, after serving in the state House for three years. More recently, lawmakers have called for tightening disclosure laws. Two proposed this year never got a vote, however.

Sabo, of New Mexico Ethics Watch, is a former legislative aide who says staff and legislators depend on food during the legislative sessions and interim committee hearings. She estimates it could cost around $50,000 to provide legislators with meals, and has drafted a law that would pay for their food. She has shopped it around to legislators for the past two years and is still looking for one to sponsor it.

Many legislators including Kernan say they are happy to accept free lunches in part because they are some of the few legislators in the country who don’t get a salary. They are eligible for a pension after 10 years of service and receive a daily stipend to offset travel costs. Kernan says the stipend is not enough to pay for lunches. As committee chair, Democrat Sen. Bill Soules of Las Cruces, has final authority over which businesses get to pay for lunch, which can earn them a few minutes to pitch their products to legislators. Soules said that he delegates the decision to staff. He echoed colleagues who said the lunches don’t affect their votes.